Market scan guide · Regulatory reporting and risk

How to run a regulatory reporting and risk software market scan

Regulatory reporting and risk software is bought by the regulator's calendar: returns change, standards arrive with dates and the system has to keep up. The scan has to test each vendor on your regulator's actual returns and on how quickly it ships a change, not on the breadth of its framework library.

Figures from the Vederca registry as of 2026-10-13: 152 regulatory reporting and risk vendors, 368 products, 17 countries.

The regulatory reporting and risk landscape in numbers

Regulatory reporting and risk software for financial institutions: the Vederca market map
The regulatory reporting and risk market map: every vendor's own mark, by named customers then name, drawn from the registry. Download the map (PNG, or as SVG).

The registry lists 152 regulatory reporting and risk vendors with 368 products, headquartered in 17 countries. 77 name at least one financial institution as a customer. 7 of the products mention an AI capability in their own text (2%).

Regulatory reporting and risk vendors by headquarters country
United States: 70United States70Australia: 33Australia33United Kingdom: 23United Kingdom23Canada: 4Canada4Belgium: 3Belgium3France: 3France3Germany: 3Germany3Netherlands: 2Netherlands2New Zealand: 2New Zealand2Switzerland: 2Switzerland2
Regulatory reporting and risk vendors by headquarters country: the figures as a table
ItemValue
United States70
Australia33
United Kingdom23
Canada4
Belgium3
France3
Germany3
Netherlands2
New Zealand2
Switzerland2
Capabilities most often mentioned by regulatory reporting and risk products
Grc: 18, 0 confirmedGrc18Obligations: 17, 0 confirmedObligations17Audit: 16, 0 confirmedAudit16Operational risk: 15, 0 confirmedOperational risk15Policy: 14, 0 confirmedPolicy14Cps230: 10, 0 confirmedCps23010Third party: 9, 0 confirmedThird party9Enterprise risk: 6, 0 confirmedEnterprise risk6Credit risk: 4, 0 confirmedCredit risk4Market liquidity: 4, 0 confirmedMarket liquidity4Board reporting: 3, 0 confirmedBoard reporting3Capital: 3, 0 confirmedCapital3
Capabilities most often mentioned by regulatory reporting and risk products: the figures as a table
ItemValue
Grc 0 confirmed18
Obligations 0 confirmed17
Audit 0 confirmed16
Operational risk 0 confirmed15
Policy 0 confirmed14
Cps230 0 confirmed10
Third party 0 confirmed9
Enterprise risk 0 confirmed6
Credit risk 0 confirmed4
Market liquidity 0 confirmed4
Board reporting 0 confirmed3
Capital 0 confirmed3
Regulatory reporting and risk vendors founded, by year
2017: 6620172018: 5520182019: 3320192020: 020202021: 1120212022: 1120222023: 2220232024: 020242025: 020252026: 112026
Regulatory reporting and risk vendors founded, by year: the figures as a table
YearCount
20176
20185
20193
20200
20211
20221
20232
20240
20250
20261

The largest by named customers

VendorHQ countryNamed customers
Clearwater AnalyticsUnited States20
PiraniUnited States14
AdminisNew Zealand11
DatacticsUnited Kingdom10
Unit21United States9
Bretton AIUnited States8
NcontractsUnited States8
RuleguardUnited Kingdom8

The newest entrants

VendorHQ countryFounded
TeciemUnited Kingdom2026
Bretton AIUnited States2023
Norm AiUnited States2023
ValidMindUnited States2022
RegnologyGermany2021
6clicksAustralia2019

The full list, with every vendor's flagship product and named customers: Regulatory reporting and risk management software.

How to evaluate regulatory reporting and risk vendors

  1. List the returns and the frameworksThe regulatory returns you file, the risk frameworks you run and the controls library you keep; score vendors on those.
  2. Test one return end to endFrom source data through lineage to the regulator's format, with a correction and a resubmission.
  3. Ask how regulatory change shipsWho tracks the regulator, how a changed return reaches you and how long it took for the last two changes.
  4. Read the data lineageEvery figure traceable to its source and its rule; the regulator's reviewer will ask.
  5. Check the GRC workflow against your three linesRisk and control self-assessment, incidents, issues and actions, with reporting to the board that your risk team would use.

The method for the scan as a whole, longlist to shortlist, is on the market scan page; the report template gives the headings.

The requirements that separate them

Must-haves in most scans of this category: the register's gates. Each needs evidence named beside it.

  • The institution's regulator's returns supported in its formats, with the change history
  • Data lineage from source to submitted figure
  • Regulatory change tracked and shipped on a stated cadence
  • Risk, control, incident and issue workflow across the three lines
  • Board and committee reporting the risk team would use as is
  • Hosting and access terms that satisfy the regulator's own outsourcing rules

The rules procurement teams ask vendors about

By country, the rules specific to regulatory reporting and risk procurements. Vederca certifies nobody against these: they say what evidence to ask for.

Australia

United Kingdom

Canada

United States

Go further